
In psychiatry, ketamine is three things: a drug of abuse, an antidepressant, and a way to mimic schizophrenia. Or rather, there are people who think of ketamine as each of these things. It seems somewhat unlikely that it could be all three at once. You don't treat depression by causing schizophrenia, and people don't deliberately give themselves psychosis, even temporarily.
Yet a journal could publish a paper about using ketamine as a model of schizophrenia, and another paper about its supposed antidepressant effects a few pages later, and few people would bat an eyelid. This is because most researchers interested in schizophrenia wouldn't read the depression paper, and vice versa.
Partly this is because, like all scientists today, psychopharmacologists tend to stick to their own research niches. But it's also a symptom of the fact that no-one's job is to study ketamine, as such. We study diseases, rather than drugs, which can lead to theories which fly in the face of half of the evidence. (See this post for another example.)
The evidence that ketamine can treat depression essentially consists of one study from 2006 (ref) and a pilot study from the same group (ref), plus a handful of case reports. Zarate et al reported that a single injection with a moderate dose of ketamine (0.5mg/kg) had a dramatic antidepressant effect in a large proportion of depressed patients, and that this lasted at least a week in some cases.
This paper sparked a flurry of interest into ketamine and depression, with animal studies and brain scans galore trying to explain how it might work. Maybe ketamine does have an antidepressant effect. But if it does, it's a miracle drug, acting much faster than any other. You need to take Prozac for several days or weeks before feeling any benefit. A single injection does diddly-squat.
The dramatic benefits seen in this study may have been simply placebo effects: the patients expected to feel much better after taking this exciting new drug, so they said they did. The study was placebo controlled, true. When people got injections of salt water, they didn't report any benefit. In theory, it was double blind - neither the patients nor the doctors knew whether they were getting ketamine or water. But you'll know when you've been injected with 0.5mg/kg ketamine. You get high. That's why people take it. The study can't really be called double blind.
To their credit, Zarate et al did acknowledge this, and suggested that in future ketamine could be compared to another drug which produces noticeable effects. But they really should have done that to begin with. This is not a criticism of these researchers - what they did was par for the course in psychopharmacology. Unfortunately.
The idea that ketamine intoxication mimics schizophrenia (ref) is an interesting one, and it may well be a model of some of the symptoms. My only ketamine experience doesn't really fit with either the schizophrenia or the antidepressant theory, however. I was slightly depressed before I took it, and it made me feel much worse. I didn't hear any voices, though. On the other hand, a good friend became addicted to the stuff for several months, and still craves it. To each his own...
9 comments:
I know a guy who had a nasty idiosyncratic reaction to it. He was a radiologist in private practice who needed minor surgery in his nose, so the anesthesiologist did him the favor of using Ketamine so he could go right back to his practice. Some favor. He had a highly unpleasant state of confusion and had to go home to recover. For several weeks he had nightmares, in particular a recurrent dream of metallic beetles crawling over his body. Not a fun experience.
It would be interesting to know why it has such varied effects. Perhaps genetic variants of glutamate receptors would be informative
I am certain that if anyone claiming to have an out of body (AKA near-death) experience tried ketamine it would clarify that the brain is capable of things we would never, ever in our wildest dreams realise, were it not for a case of severe trauma or psychoactive/dissociative drugs.
In a similar vein to the other commenters, I think ketamine is a nasty drug that can produce nightmares and near-death experiences. I felt not so much that I had died, but that I had ceased to exist.
I never took enough to get to that stage. I have no great desire to do that although I suppose ego-death is one of those things you should do before you die... Maybe one day.
re: neuroskeptic
As a recreational drug, ketamine is indeed a nasty drug. It should not be on the streets for people to get ahold of. That being said, in terms of it's efficacy for the medical community, it is a marked improvement over earlier NMDA-antagonists (phencyclidine). Authorities should be more concerned about the unchecked use of DXM rather than ketamine; I have had numerous patients thru the ER with serotonin syndrome from DXM/MDMA combos who have thought DXM had to be "harmless" due to the fact it was OTC.
For me ketamine mayor intoxication cause me alucinations, I saw literally saw an anime movie sitting in the flor, although I knew it was the ketamine all the time I was conscious of that, I do not know what exactly schisophrenic means, but I guess is not the reation that it produced me, I was seeing the movie at the same time I was aware of everything that was going on arround, and I did not freak out, I had fun, anyway I do not have much experience it was the only time in my life I alucinated, and I did not do it on purpose, a friend I guess put too much of the tihng.
So how is it?
I am no optimist believing that people, including scientists, are generally going to be open-minded or latitudinarian of interest.
We're all pretty limited and stupid--some more than others. But you really go too far in your blanket statement that scientist in field x never reads field y--especially on something with such a relatively easily surveyable research field as ketamin, whatever one's interest in it. One and the same drug can indeed do all those 'contradictory' things you list: cause/dissolve hallucinations, be therapeutic and recreational, get you high and get you sober. The brain/body have different transactional parameters and ways to frame the issue.
However, and here I'm going to agree with your scepticism: this evening after receiving my first of 5 medically supervised injections of special k antidepressant treatments, I can say that I'm not a whit better, not worse, just disappointed and out several thousand dollars.
Well I was exaggerating a little to make a point... but scientists don't read outside their fields enough. It's largely because we don't have time. I'm guilty of this myself, although less so than some people, because I'm lucky enough to have a fast reading speed (my having English as a first language helps a lot too).
With ketamine, it could be both a drug of abuse and a schizophrenia model - if some people enjoy the symptoms of schizophrenia. But that seems unlikely, people with schizophrenia rarely enjoy it, and recreational ketamine users don't report using it because it makes them hear voices or experience delusions.
I'm sure one could think up an explanation for this apparent paradox. But ketamine researchers haven't (to my knowledge) tried to do so yet, because (I think) it cuts across sub-specialty boundaries. Whereas if you were studying ketamine per se rather than ketamine-as-a-model-of-psychosis it would be the first thing you'd want to ask.
Good luck with the rest of your treatment. I hope you get your money's worth! Don't lose heart if it doesn't seem to help though, as I said, there is very little evidence that ketamine works, there are plenty of other antidepressant treatments with a much stronger evidence base (and cheaper).
Just thought I'd leave a note. I've taken it recreationaly on very rare occasions, at the K hole level. Last one being a few days ago. I'm on the web now because I've noticed that I feel quite lighter about things, as I had on other tries. I'd never heard of such an effect, so that's why I'm just learning about this. In the past I've worked with doctors about dysthymia with a variety of drugs to no effect. I'm not in any way feeling drugged, just not having those persistent negative thoughts and feelings and generally what I think would be more "normal." No insomnia, for a change, too. As I say, I never heard of this, so placebo effect seems unlikely. Well, I'll be paying attention to the duration of this this time. I'm guessing it was short of a month last time, but that was some years ago. The other thought was just that the experience is such a dramatic temporary shift in perspective that it just kicked me out of my little worries for a while, even though the experience is difficult to bring back "here." I suspect it may be more to do with what the researchers cited here are suggesting.
Post a Comment