It's every man's dream - a pill to make women want more sex. According to Boehringer Pharmaceuticals, that dream could be a reality in a few years, in the form of the strangely-named flibanserin. But is it the latest wonder-drug or just a glorified sleeping pill? Read on.Flibanserin was originally developed as an antidepressant, but in clinical trials against depression it reportedly failed to perform better than placebo. The standard for getting approved as an antidepressant is low, so this is quite an achievement.
The BBC today described flibanserin as the "Female Viagra", which is rather confusing, because it's meant to increase sexual desire, which is one thing Viagra (sidenafil) doesn't do. The reason for the Female Viagra headline is that, as Professor John Thorp says:
"It's essentially a Viagra-like drug for women in that diminished desire or libido is the most common feminine sexual problem, like erectile dysfunction is in men"Yes, one in ten women suffer apparently from "Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder" (HSDD) as Boehringer Pharmaceuticals helpfully informs us. And “As many as two out of every 10 women describe some degree of decreased sexual desire" according to the unfortunately named Dr Charles de Wet, Boehringer medical director for the UK.
HSDD is a diagnosis in the DSM-IV, the American Psychiatric Association's listing of psychiatric illnesses, and it's been recognised as a disorder since 1980. It is not, however, a very popular diagnosis yet. There are only 60,000 Google hits for it, as opposed to 1,600,000 for "major depression" and, er, 90,000 for "neuroskeptic". Odd for a disorder apparently plaguing at least 10% of women.
Indeed, some people say that it's no more than a label invented by psychiatrists who didn't understand women and then promoted by drug companies in order to sell drugs. This is almost certainly true, but it's also a bit simplistic, because there are people who perceive themselves as suffering from low libido, and if flibanserin really helps them, that's surely a good thing.
*
The main poster is Efficacy of flibanserin 100 mg qhs as a potential treatment for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in premenopausal women which pools the data from three trials with a total of about 1,400 women. They found that taking flibanserin 100 mg every night had small beneficial effects. Relative to placebo, it increased the number of "satisfying sexual encounters" by 0.7 per month. It also improved scores on questionnaire measures of sexual function, a bit.
In any trial like this you have to ask whether there is result cherry-picking going on. Maybe they asked dozens of questions about the women's sex lives, and they're only telling us about the minority where the drug seemed to work? People often do that but in this case, the Clinical Trials Register suggests there was no funny business of that kind. It also shows that there have been no trials using 100mg which weren't included in the poster, so the trials themselves weren't cherry picked either. That's reassuring. But it looks like the effects were only significant when all three trials were pooled - one poster shows the results of the ORCHID trial alone, and most were non-significant.
What about the side effects? There's a whole poster about them. 100 mg flibanserin nightly caused 14% of patients to drop out due to side effects, vs 7% in the placebo group - so an extra 7% decided it wasn't worth it. It caused dizziness, nausea, fatigue, somnolence - and bizarrely, also insomnia. Notably, 50mg daily was much worse than 100 mg nightly, which suggests that taking this at night, rather than in the morning, is a good idea. But given what it is meant to treat, you'd want to do that anyway, right?
But this leads onto my biggest problem with these findings. It's obvious from the side effects data that this drug is a sedative - it makes you tired and sleepy. The animal data confirm this. It's much more likely to put you to sleep than it is to make you enjoy sex in any given month. Off the top of my head, I suspect its sedative properties are a result of its 5HT2A antagonism.
Any sedative can increase sexual desire, as anyone who has ever been to a bar will know. So whether this drug actually has an aphrodisiac effect, as opposed to just being a sleeping pill, is anyone's guess. To find out, you'd need to compare it to a sleeping pill, say, Valium. Or a couple of glasses of wine. Until someone does that, we don't know if this drug is destined to be the next big thing or a big disappointment.
Edit: Just noticed that Dr Petra Boynton has a fantastic post about the background to flibanserin and the manufacturer's apparent attempt to recruit her to write about HSDD.
[BPSDB]
Borsini F, Evans K, Jason K, Rohde F, Alexander B, Pollentier S (2002). Pharmacology of flibanserin. CNS drug reviews, 8 (2), 117-42 PMID: 12177684
18 comments:
"the strangely-named flibanserin": it's an anagram of "flin bin arse" which may contain a clue. But probably not.
I think one good potential cause of hyposexual disorder in women that often goes unsaid is the widespread use of the birth control pill.... now I wonder why that is?
"In any trial like this you have to ask whether there is result cherry-picking going on. "
Perhaps not the best choice of words.
As a student newly introduced to neurotransmitter receptors, it might be cool to give your readers some light education on why say, a 5HT1A receptor agonist might be a good thing and a 5HT2A antagonist could have both desirable and detrimental effects. Kind of like the good insight given about the D4 dopaminergic receptor stimulation.
I dig the skeptical tone, nothing beats those self-absorbed academics like a cynical (and presumed-to-be) expert.
Is it really true that a sedative increases libido?
A sedative might reduce inhibition but I think it would be more likely to depress libido.
Stimulants on the other hand...
pj - True, it could be argued whether sedatives actually increase libido or just remove inhibitions. the end result is similar though so I think my point stands.
There's also the possibility that the drug worked by improving mood - it is an antidepressant after all, albeit a failed one, but even if it had a weak effect, that might be enough to improve your sex life. The women in these studies were excluded if they had a current MDE but they were allowed to have a BDI of up to 14 and a history of depression so long as it was >6 months ago, so some of them may have been somewhat depressed.
I'm not sure how effective the partial D4 agonist property will be in increasig libido. D4, is similar to D2, in that it inhibits adenylyl cyclase and it's a postsynaptic receptor mainly found in the frontal cortex, medulla, and midbrain as opposed to the ventral striatum. It might decrease DA output instead of increasing it.
Anonymous: Ooh, matron. At least I didn't say they'd been "massaging the figures".
Wavetrain: Thanks. The problem with 5HT receptors is no-one really knows what they do, especially 5HT1A and 5HT2A. People have linked 5HT2A for example with everything from the hallucinogenic effects of LSD, to sleep, to mood, to psychosis...
NeuroPsych15: Good point. I should point out that the D4 theory was my comment, not the drug companies'. From their press release they seem to pushing the idea that it's a serotonin action:
"Flibanserin acts as an agonist at the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor and as an antagonist at the 5HT2A receptor with preferential affinity to selective brain areas. It is believed to act on neurotransmitters within the brain that are thought to play a role in sexual response. By modulating these neurotransmitter systems, flibanserin may help to restore a balance between inhibitory and excitatory factors leading to a healthy sexual response."
Looking for Viagra? through Exact Pharma, offer many Erectile Dysfunction products like Viagra Pills, Buy Viagra at competitive prices with great customer service.
Thanks for that, Daniel. I'm surprised I've only had one piece of spam on this post so far.
I just noticed that the guy who said "As many as two out of every 10 women describe some degree of decreased sexual desire" is called Dr de Wet. Hurr hurr.
Neuro;on your HSDD comment re;google.
Try Female Sexual Disorder and there is 1,600,000 hits there.
I agree with your opinion of flibanserin.A far superior approach is Libigel,a testosterone product soon to be out in late 2011.It is for menopausal women,but a large market nonetheless.And of course pre menopausal women will be using it off label as well(some anyway)
Much better results;a phase 2 study had the gel showing 5 more SSEs per month above baseline vs 1 over baseline for placebo.
NO SIDE EFFECTS!
hello friend amazing blog about One Pill Makes Your Libido Larger, I would like to get this pill because I have many libido killers in my life and I'm losing my husband, thanks for sharing this post I really appreciate your help
I've really enjoyed having a look around your blog today, keep up the good work!
It's great when you are just surfing the web and find something wonderful like this!
a good read very interesting stuff would like to see more
Kamagra
Viagra alternatives uk
"It's essentially a Viagra-like drug for women in that diminished desire or libido is the most common feminine sexual problem, like erectile dysfunction is in men"
So this was called menopausal then???
Thank you for sharing to us.there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us
Thank you for sharing to us.there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us
Post a Comment