
DNA is a series of bases, and fundamentally there are just four: C, A, T and G. However, the Cs and the As can be methylated, i.e. modified by the addition of a very simple methyl chemical group. They then stay that way until they get demethylated in the reverse process. Methylating a gene generally reduces its expression.
It's a bit like writing notes in pencil on top of a printed document: it doesn't change the underlying genetic sequence, but it's a semi-permanent change and it can be inherited by dividing cells. Methylation is a classic example of an epigenetic change, and epigenetics is very hot right now.
When they blocked these changes by injecting a DNA methylation inhibitor into the frontal cortex, it caused amnesia - even if the drug was given 30 days after the learning had taken place. In other words, the methylation inhibitors somehow erased the memory traces. These authors have previously reported that the same kind of learning causes a short-lived increase in methylation in the hippocampus. Taken together with these data, this fits with the well-known theory that memory traces start off being stored in the hippocampus and are then somehow transferred to the cortex later.
This kind of research has a bit of a history. The idea that memories are stored in DNA has led some to theorize that memories can be inherited. It also reminds me of the work of psychologist and Unabomber-victim James McConnell, who claimed that planarian worms can learn information by eating the ground-up remains of other worms who knew something...
These data are very interesting, but they don't imply anything quite so exciting. The pattern of methylation seemed entirely random (except in the sense that it was targeted at certain genes) - so rather than encoding information per se, the DNA changes were acting as a way of reducing CaN gene expression. Most likely, the reduction in CaN was limited to certain cells, and these were the cells that formed the connections that encoded the information.

9 comments:
Memories are stored in the synapses... how?
If prions can evolve without DNA why shouldn't genes retain aspects of their former owner?
Hi Neuroskeptic -
Very, very cool stuff. Thank you for posting this!
- pD
petrossa. I suppose the methylated DNA in order to form a memory is the one in some neurons, not in the gametes.
Neuroskeptic. Than you very much for bring us this paper here. It is amazing.
Neuro:
Nice post. The research reported also echoes Jung's theories about acquired hereditary psychological characteristics-- the archetypes! WOW! Both Jung and Lamarck live!!!!
Anonymous #1: I've got no idea - well we know a bit about how the strengthening of certain synapses underlies very simple forms of memory like fear conditioning, but, as for what's going on when you remember what you did two weeks ago, that's very unclear. It almost certainly has to do with synapses, though, if only because there's nothing else it realistically could be, they're the only things in the brain that could change fast enough to encode memory. Unless we're missing something massive.
I'm not a neuroscientist, but the statement that memories could be inherited is a bit too far over the top for me. "When the process is inhibited it causes amnesia". From that I conclude that the only thing that could be inherited is the fact that the "current information", whatever this is, is to be remembered or not.
Love the post. I actually work across the hall from the lab where this research is being done. Any questions I should ask the Sweatt lab?
Hello,
Thank you very much for your attention and positive comments. The role of DNA cytosine methylation, an epigenetic regulator of chromatin structure and function, during normal and pathological brain development and aging remains unclear...
Post a Comment