After a period of heavy use, hard disks tend to get 'fragmented'. Data gets written all over random parts of the disk, and it gets inefficient to keep track of it all.
That's why you need to run a defragmentation program occasionally. Ideally, you do this overnight, while you're asleep, so it doesn't stop you from using the computer.
A new paper from some Stanford neuroscientists argues that the function of sleep is to reorganize neural connections - a bit like a disk defrag for the brain - although it's also a bit like compressing files to make more room, and a bit like a system reset: Synaptic plasticity in sleep: learning, homeostasis and disease
The basic idea is simple. While you're awake, you're having experiences, and your brain is forming memories. Memory formation involves a process called long-term potentiation (LTP) which is essentially the strengthening of synaptic connections between nerve cells.
Yet if LTP is strengthening synapses, and we're learning all our lives, wouldn't the synapses eventually hit a limit? Couldn't they max out, so that they could never get any stronger?
Worse, the synapses that strengthen during memory are primarily glutamate synapses - and these are dangerous. Glutamate is a common neurotransmitter, and it's even a flavouring, but it's also a toxin.
Too much glutamate damages the very cells that receive the messages. Rather like how sound is useful for communication, but stand next to a pneumatic drill for an hour, and you'll go deaf.
So, if our brains were constantly forming stronger glutamate synapses, we might eventually run into serious problems. This is why we sleep, according to the new paper. Indeed, sleep deprivation is harmful to health, and this theory would explain why.
The authors argue that during deep, dreamless slow-wave sleep (SWS), the brain is essentially removing the "extra" synaptic strength formed during the previous day. But it does so in a way that preserves the memories. A bit like how defragmentation reorganizes the hard disk to increase efficiency, without losing data.
One possible mechanism is 'synaptic scaling'. When some of the inputs onto a given cell become stronger, all of the synapses on that cell could weaken. This would preserve the relative strength of the different inputs while keeping the total inputs constant. It's known that synaptic scaling happens in the brain, although it's not clear whether it has anything to do with sleep.
There are other theories of the restorative function of sleep, but this one seems pretty plausible. It stands in contrast to the idea that sleep is purely a form of inactivity designed to save energy, rather than being important in itself.
What this paper doesn't explain, and doesn't try to, is dreaming, REM sleep, which is very different to slow-wave sleep. REM is not required for life, so long as you get SWS, and some animals don't have REM, but they all have SWS, although in some animals, only one side of the brain has it at a time.
So it makes sense, but what's the evidence? There's quite a bit - but, it all comes from very simple animals, like flies and fish.
The pictures above show that, in various parts of the brain of the fruit fly, measures of synaptic strength are increased in flies that have been awake for some time, compared to recently rested ones. In general, synapses increase during the wake cycle and then return to baseline during sleep.
There's similar evidence from fish. But the authors admit that no-one has yet shown that the same is true of any mammals - let alone humans.
I'd say that this is important, because the fly brain is literally a million times smaller than ours. Synaptic overgrowth could be a more serious problem for a fly because they just have fewer neurons to play with. Sleep may have evolved to prune extra connections in primitive brains, and then shifted to playing a very different role in ours.
Wang G, Grone B, Colas D, Appelbaum L, & Mourrain P (2011). Synaptic plasticity in sleep: learning, homeostasis and disease. Trends in Neurosciences PMID: 21840068
16 comments:
A very interesting blog post - thank you.
Is SWS the same as deep sleep?
I would disagree with the bit of your post below.
"...no-one has yet shown that the same is true of any mammals - let alone humans.
I'd say that this is important, because the fly brain is literally a million times smaller than ours. Synaptic overgrowth could be a more serious problem for a fly because they just have fewer neurons to play with. Sleep may have evolved to prune extra connections in primitive brains, and then shifted to playing a very different role in ours."
I agree it is likely that sleep functions very differently in flies and fish versus humans. However, I would expect that synaptic overgrowth is a larger problem for us than it is for flies. This is simply because we have more neurons per body mass, which means that we are pushing the limit on energy consumption and physical space.
Regardless, this post was really interesting. I just think you can infer more about humans from this study than you give credit for.
Anonymous: I suspect you're right. I was just saying that we can't assume the function of sleep is the same. For one thing, we know that sleep has at least partially changed its function because primitive animals (i.e. invertebrates and fish AFAIK) don't have REM sleep at all. REM was an evolutionary novelty which somehow attached itself to the older system of non-REM sleep. Given which, it's possible that non-REM sleep changed in function.
Could this mean that it's possible that humans don't need sleep in the future?
Previous research on this subject can be found at:
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/neco.2009.05-08-787
Neuroskeptic said...
REM was an evolutionary novelty which somehow attached itself to the older system of non-REM sleep. Given which, it's possible that non-REM sleep changed in function.
Anonymous said...
Could this mean that it's possible that humans don't need sleep in the future?
Anonymous I would say that antidepressants have taught us how very important REM Sleep is and that going without it can be DEADLY!! Repress REM and the brain forces you into periods of REM during wakefulness. The end result is the deadly REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) in which 80% of patients hurt themselves or someone else while acting out their dreams in a sleepwalk state. Antidepressants repress REM and are found in 86% of those being diagnosed with RBD making it clear to me that going without sleep is NOT an option! We have long known that sleep deprivation produces psychosis.
I like the way you made analogies to several computer processes but didn't oversimplify the complexity of synaptic restructuring. And I'm glad you like the figures I put together. ;-)
Hm. I wonder what happens when one is both aware and awake (semi-conscious?) and having slow-wave brain activity. I mean, can one have LTP and slow-wave activity at the same time?
I sometimes have slow-wave activity while at least semi-conscious. (I'd say I was awake at the time, but memories of what went on during seem a bit hazy and distant afterward.) After one of these episodes, I feel refreshed and energized, like I had a good sleep even though my brain was processing input the entire time. I wonder if the episodes are as useful as a good nap or if their feeling refreshing is essentially my brain tricking itself.
Not that I expect you (or anyone, really) to know the answers to any of this. I'm well-aware brain damage has made my brain and its functioning very unusual indeed. (It's not a good thing when you make the EEG guy's jaw drop.) From time to time I wonder about the odd things my brain does or doesn't but it's very rare that anyone can tell me much about it. Even my neurologist, very knowledgeable about the disease, goes "Hmm. That happens."
Brain Grone: Thanks for the comment. As I understand it, there's no ideal analogy between your proposed function of sleep and anything that happens in a computer, but I thought defragmentation is probably the closest, in the sense that defragmentation is a problem that results from inefficient storage of information, rather than just "too much" data.
Indeed as you note, sleep can actually help recall. Defragmentation helps you access data faster.
Besides, do flies always sleep by night?
What about the many nocturnal mammals?
What about the flying mammals with an extra radar sense and no vision? (bats)
What about a human family branch that evolved in part from a tribe of primitive hominids that hunted by night in ancient Africa?
We know absolutely nothing.
Just too early to extract any useful conclusions about anything but the actual subjects of study.
Once again people steal my ideal I came up with this same thme shit Years ago and now they are going to to credit for my matterial
Once again people steal my concepts and ideal I came up with this same shit many years ago and now scientist like always steal from everyone else and call it they own discovery
Sorry for the double post no stupid editor.
Robert
Very interesting, and the metaphor that compares the sleep with a defragmentation is superb.
"hard disks tend to get 'fragmented'. Data gets written all over random parts of the disk." That's what external hard disks are for! True, the human brain is a much more complex machine than a hard disk, but unfortunately we, unlike our laptop, can't just attach an external storage space and move all our memories there,
Extending the computer analogy, could the random combinations in REM sleep dreams be the brain performing evolutionary computation, i.e. problem solving ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_computing
Post a Comment