Wednesday, 20 January 2010

The Sweet Taste of Cannabinoids

Every stoner knows about the munchies, the fondness for junk food that comes with smoking marijuana. Movies have been made about it.

It's not just that being on drugs makes you like eating: stimulants, like cocaine and amphetamine, decrease appetite. The munchies are something specific to marijuana. But why?

New research from a Japanese team reveals that marijuana directly affects the cells in the taste buds which detect sweet flavours - Endocannabinoids selectively enhance sweet taste.

Yoshida et al studied mice, and recorded the electrical signals from the chorda tympani (CT), which carries taste information from the tongue to the brain.

They found that injecting the mice with two chemicals, 2AG and AEA, markedly increased the strength of the signals produced in response to sweet tastes - such as sugar, or the sweetener saccharine. However, neither had any effect on the strength of the response to other flavours, like salty, bitter, or sour. Mice given endocannabinoids were also more eager to eat and drink sweet things, which confirms previous findings.

2-AG and AEA are both endocannabinoids, an important class of neurotransmitters. Marijuana's main active ingredient, Δ9-THC, works by mimicking the action of endocannabinoids. Although Δ9-THC wasn't tested in this study, it's extremely likely that it has the same effects as 2-AG and AEA.

In follow-up experiments, Yoshida et al found that endocannabinoids enhance sweet taste responses by acting on cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptors on the tongue's sweet taste cells themselves. In fact, over half of the sweet receptor cells expressed CB1 receptors!

This is an important finding, because CB1 receptors are already known to regulate the pleasurable response to sweet foods (amongst other things) in the brain. These new data don't challenge this, but suggest that CB1 also modulates the most basic aspects of sweet taste perception. The munchies are probably caused by Δ9-THC acting at multiple levels of nervous system.

This paper also sheds light on CB1 antagonists. Given that drugs which activate CB1 make people eat more, it would make sense if CB1 blockers made people eat less, and therefore lose weight, a kind of anti-munchies effect. And indeed they do. Which is why rimonabant, a CB1 antagonist, was released onto the market in 2006 as a weight loss drug. It worked pretty well, although unfortunately it also it caused clinical depression in some people, so it was banned in Europe in 2008 and was never approved in the USA for the same reason.

The depression was almost certainly caused by antagonism at CB1 receptors in the brain, but Yoshida et al's findings suggest that a CB1 antagonist which didn't enter the brain, and only affected peripheral sites such as the taste buds, might be able to make people less fond of sweet foods without causing the same side-effects. Who knows - in a few years you might even be able to buy CB1 antagonist chewing gum to help you stick to your diet...

ResearchBlogging.orgYoshida, R., Ohkuri, T., Jyotaki, M., Yasuo, T., Horio, N., Yasumatsu, K., Sanematsu, K., Shigemura, N., Yamamoto, T., Margolskee, R., & Ninomiya, Y. (2009). Endocannabinoids selectively enhance sweet taste Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (2), 935-939 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912048107

7 comments:

darwinsdog said...

Thing is, tho, that the munchies don't make me crave sweets. They make me crave fat, salt & capsaicin. So what's up with that?

David said...

an interesting post, but still, rats aren't people (excepting attorneys).

rimonabant, a CB1 antagonist, produced weight loss but did not produce common Adverse Event reports of taste disturbance.

pj said...

A question this raises though is how could action peripherally increase craving for foods since this is presumably a centrally mediated effect.

Neuroskeptic said...

darwinsdog: Well, that's presumably a central effect. We don't know to what extent these peripheral effects underly the munchies in humans, but I'd be surprised if they weren't a factor.

David: It's true that no-one reported taste disturbance with rimonabant. But no-one's gone looking specifically for that under controlled conditions...

pj: There's a difference between craving food and enjoying it, presumably craving is a central effect; enjoyment depends on central processing too, but these results suggest that peripheral effects could also impair enjoyment of sweets. Which is surprising (I've been following the literature on CB1 antagonists closely, and it surprised me.)

Pietr Hitzig said...

Darwinsdog:

I have found that dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) precursors mixed with sweets each lose their sweetness as CNS levels of each neurotransmitter (NT) seems to reach its appropriate level.

MJ increases both DA and 5HT. We crave the NT we are most deficient in. Craving sweets suggest DA deficiency while craving carbs, fat and hot peppers indicates 5HT down. Capsaicin is a very powerful 5HT agonist.

Incidentally, more women crave sweets and chocolate (DA down) and men are meat and potatoes (5HT).

May I venture to guess that you are most likely male and more prone to anxiety than depression? Furthermore, you think quite clearly but might have impulse control problems.

Todd Goninon said...

What about blood sugar levels- is that affected by cannabis use?

Pietr Hitzig said...

Activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors induces glucose intolerance in rats