Subscribe Now!

Saturday, 27 February 2010

The Decline and Fall of the Cannabinoid Antagonists

Cannabinoid Receptor, Type 1 (CB1) antagonists were supposed to be the next big thing.

They're weight loss drugs, and with obesity rates rising and the diet craze showing no signs of abating, that's a large and growing market (...sorry). They worked, at least in the short term, and they were at least as effective as existing pills. They may even have had health benefits over and above promoting weight loss, such as improving blood fat and sugar levels through metabolic effects.

It all started off well. Rimonabant, manufactured by Sanofi, was the first CB1 antagonist to become available for human use: it hit the European market in 2006, as Acomplia. Four large clinical trials showed convincingly that it helped people lose weight. Rival drug companies were hard at work developing other CB1 antagonists, and inverse agonists (similar, but even more potent). The "bants" included Merck's taranabant, Pfizer's otenabant, and more.

Even more excitingly, there were indications that CB1 antagonists could do more than help people lose weight: they might also be useful in helping people quit smoking, alcohol or drugs. The animal evidence that CB1 antagonists did this was strong. Human trials were underway. Optimists saw rimonabant and related drugs as offering something unprecedented: self-control in a pill, abstinence on demand.

*

But it ended in tears, literally. Rimonabant was pulled from the European market in late 2008; it was never approved in the USA at all. After rimonabant was withdrawn, drug companies abandoned the development of other CB1 antagonists.

The problem was that they made people depressed. In several large clinical trials of rimonabant it raised the risk of suffering depression and other psychiatric problems, like anxiety and irritability, compared to placebo. The reported rates of these symptoms ranged from a few % up to over 40% depending upon the population, but there have been no trials (except very small ones) in which these effects weren't seen. This means that CB1 antagonists cause depression rather more consistently than antidepressants treat it.

Merck have just released the data from a trial of taranabant: A clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of taranabant, a CB1R inverse agonist, in obese and overweight patients. It makes a fitting epitaph to the CB1 antagonists. They gave taranabant, at a range of doses, or placebo, to overweight people to go alongside diet and exercise to help them lose weight. The results were extremely similar to those seen with rimonabant; the drug worked:

But there were side effects. Alongside things like nausea, vomiting, and sweating, about 35% of people taking high doses of taranabant reported "psychiatric disorders". 20% of people on placebo also did, so this is not quite as bad as it first appears, but it's still striking, especially since a number of people on high doses of taranabant reported suicidal thoughts or behaviours...

Suicidal ideation was reported in three patients in the taranabant 6-mg group in year 1 and in one patient in the 4-mg group in year 2. There was one suicide attempt reported in a patient with a previous history of suicide attempts in the 6/2-mg group while the patient was receiving 2-mg, and one episode of suicidal behavior reported in a patient in the 6/2-mg group while the patient was receiving 6-mg. There were no completed suicides. The adjudication of possibly suicide-related adverse experiences during years 1 and 2 indicated an increased incidence of suicidality in the taranabant groups...
This is the kind of thing that gives drug companies nightmares, especially today, in the post-SSRI lawsuits era. This is why rimonabant was removed from the EU market in 2008 and why it was never approved in the US.

*

Safety concerns have plagued weight loss medications for decades. The problem is not that they don't work: plenty of drugs cause weight loss, at least for as long as you keep taking them. But unfortunately, there's always a 'but'.

Fenfluramine worked, but it caused heart valve defects, and was banned. Sibutramine works, but it's just been suspended from the European market due to concerns over heart disease (a different kind). Amphetamine-like stimulants such as phentermine work, but they're addictive and liable to abuse. What with rimonabant and sibutramine are gone, the only weight-loss drug approved for use in Europe is orlistat, which seems to be safe, but has some very unpleasant side effects...

Still, CB1 antagonists have a unique mechanism of action: they block the CB1 receptor, which is what gets activated by the cannabinoid ingredients in marijuana, and also the brain's own cannabinoids neurotransmitters
(endocannabinoids). The past five years has seen a huge amount of research showing that the CB1 receptor is involved in everything from memory and emotion to motivation, pain sensation and hormone secretion. We recently learned that there are even CB1 receptors on the tongue that regulate taste.

CB1 is able to do all this because it's found almost everywhere in the brain. To simplify, but only a little, the endocannabinoid system is a general feedback mechanism, which allows cells on the receiving end of neural transmission to "talk back" to the neuron sending them signals; if they're receiving lots of input, they tell the cell sending the signals to quiet down. In other words, endocannabinoids regulate the release of just about every other neurotransmitter. To be honest, given how important the system is in the brain, it's surprising that depression and anxiety are the biggest problems with CB1 antagonists.

For all that, we still don't know why they cause psychiatric symptoms, although a number of mechanisms have been suggested. Hopefully, someone will work this out sooner or later, since that would add an important piece to the puzzle of what goes on in the brain during depression...

ResearchBlogging.orgAronne, L., Tonstad, S., Moreno, M., Gantz, I., Erondu, N., Suryawanshi, S., Molony, C., Sieberts, S., Nayee, J., Meehan, A., Shapiro, D., Heymsfield, S., Kaufman, K., & Amatruda, J. (2010). A clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of taranabant, a CB1R inverse agonist, in obese and overweight patients: a high-dose study International Journal of Obesity DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.21

9 comments:

reasonsformoving said...

"To be honest, given how important the system is in the brain, it's surprising that depression and anxiety are the biggest problems with CB1 antagonists."

Maybe that's why there's an association between psychosis and marijuana use.

And does the results of "bants" suggest that marijuana might be a potent antidepressant?

Neuroskeptic said...

Well, I'm not sure that people would be willing to accept marijauna as an antidepressant (since a lot of people seem to have a big problem with it in terminal cancer), but there's an interesting class of drugs under development that block the breakdown of endocannabinoids - FAAH inhibitors.

In animals, they seem to do just about everything - antidepressant, anti-anxiety, pain relief, anti-inflammatory... and unlike THC they don't cause anxiety in animals at high doses. (Which fits with the fact that some people get anxious or panicky after smoking too much weed).

I'm not aware of any human studies on FAAH inhibitors but with any luck we'll know more in a few years... they're one to watch.

dearieme said...

This is such a tale of woe it makes me wonder whether there's something reasonably healthy about being overweight (for some people).

Roger Bigod said...

The closest association is between reports of bad effects of marijuana and fraud. If a drug company had the track record of these "researchers", the management would be in jail.

reasonsformoving said...

"In animals, they seem to do just about everything"

That should give one pause. Sounds like a "dirty drug" that does too much. Of course, that's not to say these drugs couldn't be refined, but until they are, wide-spread effects are as much a bad thing as they are good.

Neuroskeptic said...

Fair point, more actions is not always better. But they're certainly interesting. No currently used drugs (afaik) inhibit endocannabinoid breakdown, the closest thing we have are CB1 agonists like THC from marijuana.

But breakdown/reuptake inhibitors often have very different effects to straight agonists, e.g. apomorphine is a dopamine receptor agonist, and its primary effects are to give you an erection and make you sick (not the best combo). whereas cocaine is a dopamine reuptake inhibitor and it doesn't do that.

David said...

I've read that cannaboid type medications were being researched; now I know a bit more about them - thanks! =)

Neuroskeptic said...

I just heard on the pharmaceutical grapevine that a clinical trial of a FAAH inhibitor is starting soon.

Anonymous said...

I started smoking cannabis when i was 29, throughout my teenaged years and through my twenties I suffered from depression and anxiety. Since smoking cannabis, It has helped me quit drinking, I didnt like the way i felt if i mixed cannabis with alcohol so I picked one, cannabis and I havent had an alcholic drink since, its has eased my depression and I dont feel so much anxiety. It is now going to help me quit smoking tobacco, again, I am making the choice to choose between the two and quite frankly, cannabis is going to win hands down. I see it as a medication not as some illegal substance. Nobody has ever died from cannabis, it is impossible, the amount you would need to consume is incredibly high and the effects would kick in long before the lethal dose would ever be reached. I have done my own research on cannabis and as far as I am concerned, the law against this wonder drug (yes it is) is in itself illegal as the reasons behind the prohibition are totally unfounded and false not to mention unethical.