
Why does confabulation happen? An influential theory is that confabulation is caused by a failure to filter out irrelevant memories. Suppose I ask you to tell me what happened yesterday. As you reply, yesterday's memories will probably trigger all kinds of associations with other memories, but you'll able to recognize those as irrelevant: that wasn't yesterday, that was last week.
A confabulating patient can't do that, this theory says, so they end up with a huge jumble of memories; the confabulated stories are an attempt to make some sense of this mess. See above for my attempt to confabulate a story linking the three random concepts of a cat, a fire engine and a chair.
Now British neuroscientists Turner, Cipolotti and Shallice argue that this is only part of the truth: Spontaneous confabulation, temporal context confusion and reality monitoring. They discuss three patients, all of whom began to confabulate after suffering ruptured aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery, which destroyed parts of their ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Patient HS was a 59-year-old man admitted after being found disoriented in the street. [he] had undergone clipping of an ACoA aneurysm 25 years previously. He had been left with a profound confusional state, memory impairment, and confabulation. As a result, HS had been unable to return to work and had spent at least part of the intervening period homeless...To the surreal:
He... continued to produce spontaneous confabulations involving temporal distortions (believing that he had undergone surgery only 18 months previously) and other source memory distortions (confusing memories of interactions with the examiner with interactions with other patients).
GN was disoriented to place, situation, and time and produced consistent confabulations, for example, believing that the year was 1972 and that he was in a hospital in America after being shot. He regularly produced markedly bizarre confabulations, for example, reporting that he had attended a party the night before and met a woman with a bee’s head. He frequently attemptedAnyway, in order to try to discover the mechanism of confabulation, they gave the patients some memory tests. The results were clear: the confabulating patients had no problems remembering stuff, but were unable to tell where they remembered it from.
to act upon his mistaken beliefs, for example, attempting to leave the hospital to attend meetings.
For example, in one task, the subjects were shown a series of pictures, some of which appeared only once, and some of which were repeated. They had to say which ones were repeats.
The patients did normally the first time they did this task, but when they did the test again, this time with a different subset of pictures repeated, they ran into problems, saying pictures that appeared only once during the session were repeats. They were unable to tell the difference between repeats within the session and repeats from previous sessions. This replicates an earlier study of other confabulators.

Subjects were read a list of 15 words, and also told to silently imagine 15 other words (e.g. "imagine a fruit beginning with A" - apple). They were later asked to remember the words and to say whether they were heard or just imagined. Patients did well on the task except that they wrongly said that they'd actually heard many of the imagined words.
The authors conclude that confabulation is caused by a failure to recognize the source of memories, not just in terms of time, but in terms of whether they were real or fantasy. For a confabulator, all memories are of equal importance. Why this happens as a result of damage to certain parts of the brain remains, however, a mystery.

11 comments:
Interesting. I wonder how this relates to the tendency of small children to spontaneously tell off-topic, invented stories as if they were true. Perhaps that same part of the brain that is damaged in confabulators is not yet fully developed in toddlers.
(I am the parent of a toddler and have been listening to a lot of these odd stories lately.)
Sounds a lot like what my ex-wife does in child support Court hearings.
Confabulation is so fascinating. Great find, and nice write-up. There's a good book on the topic that I've begun (but not yet finished) called "Brain Fiction" that I can (o far) recommend.
Fascinating post! Confabulation - a good word I'm going to have to try to start working in to everyday conversations. I would suggest that times of high stress can trigger this as well - events are remembered very poorly and subjectively and some things are remembered that didn't happen, or happened earlier or before, etc. Another avenue for research.
What I mean is that in times of high stress, your brain is running at a mile a minute and doesn't have time to sort out relevant and irrelevant information, so memories of the event could suffer from the effect of confabulation. Food for thought, anyway.
This sounds like it was about integration, and hippocampus is important for the question where.
Look at the research of Michael Persinger and Murphy about hallucinations.
This explains my former landlord, a "recovering" alcoholic. But seriously, how interesting! I had no idea of the particular biological causes of what I've been calling "Big Fish" syndrome.
Could this be what mythomania or compulsive lying is all about in some people?
I wonder if confabulation could have something to do with the origin of shamanism (that bee-lady sounds familiar :-). Seriously, how impaired are the patients in daily life? In the right mythological environment, they could be taken for inspired; or not?
anonymous #1: Right. Although it's possible to start seeing Korsakoff's syndrome wherever you look for it which is probably wrong. Some people just tell tall tales for fun... especially if they're drunk.
anonymous #2: I think it could be. Although it's not lying per se, because they think it's true.
This is such an interesting topic. One thing I have noticed with children and young people who have suffered severe abuse or neglect is their tendency to tell tall tales. I wonder if that is a combination of the neurological impact of trauma on the developing brain, and immaturity of memory systems linked to early deprivation, and maybe some kind of psychological gain from getting attention? Many of these children find themselves in hot water for 'lying', and end up not being believed about serious things because they make up so much, Thanks to Bradley for the suggested book too!
Post a Comment