Wednesday, 13 October 2010

Cannabinoids in Huntington's Disease

Two recent papers have provided strong evidence that the brain's endocannabinoid system is dysfunctional in Huntington's Disease, paving the way to possible new treatments.

Huntington's Disease is a genetic neurological disorder. Symptoms generally appear around age 40, and progress gradually from subtle movement abnormalities to dementia and complete loss of motor control. It's incurable, although medication can mask some of the symptoms. Singer Woodie Guthrie is perhaps the disease's best known victim: he ended his days in a mental institution.

The biology of Huntington's is only partially understood. It's caused by mutations in the huntingtin gene, which lead to the build-up of damaging proteins in brain cells, especially in the striatum. But exactly how this produces symptoms is unclear.

The two new papers show that cannabinoids play an important role. First off, Van Laere et al used PET imaging to measure levels of CB1 receptors in the brain of patients in various stages of Huntington's. CB1 is the main cannabinoid receptor in the brain; it responds to natural endocannabinoid neurotransmitters, and also to THC, the active ingredient in marijuana.

They found serious reductions in all areas of the brain compared to healthy people, and interestingly, the loss of CB1 receptors occurred early in the course of the disease:

That was an important finding, but it didn't prove that CB1 loss was causing any problems: it might have just been a side-effect of the disease. Now another study using animals has shown that it's not: Blazquez et al. They studied mice with the same mutation that causes Huntington's in humans. These unfortunate rodents develop Huntington's, unsurprisingly.

They found that Huntington's mice who also had a mutation eliminating the CB1 receptor suffered more severe symptoms, which appeared earlier, and progressed faster. This suggests that CB1 plays a neuroprotective role, which is consistent with lots of earlier studies in other disorders.

If so, drugs that activate CB1 - like THC - might be able to slow down the progression of the disease, and indeed it did: Huntington's mice given THC injections stayed healthier for longer, although they eventually succumbed to the disease. Further experiments showed that mutant huntingtin switches off expression of the CB1 receptor gene, explaining the loss of CB1.

This graph shows performance on the RotaRod test of co-ordination: mice with Huntington's (R6/2) got worse and worse starting at 6 weeks of age (white bars), but THC slowed down the decline (black bars). The story was similar for other symptoms, and for the neural damage seen in the disease.

They conclude that:
Altogether, these results support the notion that downregulation of type 1 cannabinoid receptors is a key pathogenic event in Huntington’s disease, and suggest that activation of these receptors in patients with Huntington’s disease may attenuate disease progression.
Now, this doesn't mean people with Huntington's should be heading out to buy Bob Marley posters and bongs just yet. For one thing, Huntington's disease often causes psychiatric symptoms, including depression and psychosis. Cannabis use has been linked to psychosis fairly convincingly, so marijuana might make those symptoms worse.

Still, it's very promising. In particular, it will be interesting to try out next-generation endocannabinoid boosting drugs, such as FAAH inhibitors, which block the breakdown of anandamide, one of the most important endocannabinoids.

In animals FAAH inhibitors have pain relieving, anti-anxiety, and other beneficial effects, but they don't cause the same behavioural disruptions that THC does. This suggests that they wouldn't get people high, either, but there's no published data on what they do in humans yet...

ResearchBlogging.orgVan Laere K, et al. (2010). Widespread decrease of type 1 cannabinoid receptor availability in Huntington disease in vivo. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 51 (9), 1413-7 PMID: 20720046

Blázquez C, et al. (2010). Loss of striatal type 1 cannabinoid receptors is a key pathogenic factor in Huntington's disease. Brain : a journal of neurology PMID: 20929960

22 comments:

Socrates said...

I could've sworn that cannabis-psychosis study said smoking dope (in the countryside) protects you from psychosis...

Anonymous said...

So maybe cannabis (THC) is selectively neuroprotective? Wow. "Don't Bogart that joint my friend, pass it along to me!"

Michael said...

Neuro -- I'm interested in what you think of this research that seems to make claims of a link between psychosis and cannabis use very hard to maintain.

http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/2010.6?home

Socrates said...

The abstract of that paper.

Of the 3801 kids in that study, even without Cannabis induced psychosis one would expect c.40 to develop schizophrenia.

Neuroskeptic said...

Michael: I haven't read that paper, but a skim read suggests that it does support a link between cannabis and psychosis.

"Early cannabis use is associated with psychosis-
related outcomes in young adults. The use of sibling
pairs reduces the likelihood that unmeasured confounding
explains these findings. This study provides
further support for the hypothesis that early cannabis use
is a risk-modifying factor for psychosis-related outcomes
in young adults."


Although the data are weird. Young women had more nonaffective psychosis (i.e. schizophrenia or similar) than young men, which is the opposite of what you generally find, and parental mental illness didn't correlate with psychosis, which likewise is unusual.

Michael said...

Oops! Sorry -- I pasted the wrong link in. (Where are my subeditors?!?!!) This is the one I meant. It's a really large study that seems to be really convincing to me.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19560900

Neuroskeptic said...

Michael: Ah OK, the "where are extra psychotics"? argument.

I agree that it's a serious point, and any theory of a cannabis/psychosis link will have to account for that.

However, equally, any theory about how there is no link has to account for the other evidence suggesting that there is...

I don't know if anyone has come up with an explanation for all of the data yet.

Socrates said...

There have been a number of psychosis early intervention projects set-up recently - here's our local one.


I recall hearing them claim they work hard to avoid giving people a dx of schizophrenia - and that a single psychotic episode, caught early does get you that particular ticket anymore...

Socrates said...

that should be "does not"

veri said...

Where the hell is Petrossa? I miss him. When I occasionally roll a joint I swear my brain synapses feel better. I should've been a pharmacist.. I'd have been so popular.

I reckon the education system should emphasize access. Do you have access to essential medicines, foods, water. Are you self sustainable? I bet a cleaner at the White House is more lucrative than a stockbroker in Zurich.

Lars said...

@Neuroskeptic: You write: 'In animals FAAH inhibitors have pain relieving, anti-anxiety, and other beneficial effects, but they don't cause the same behavioural disruptions that THC does. This suggests that they wouldn't get people high, either [...]'. Have the purported psychoses been definitively linked to the high, or might they occur without the high?

Neuroskeptic said...

Lars: I don't think we know. However, I'd bet a lot of money that they're linked to the high, because being high causes psychotic symptoms in some people (including me, with some strains of cannabis)...

Socrates said...

Would I be right in suggesting that some of the "psychotic" symptoms are a long way from the screaming heebeegeebees the word "Psychosis" conjures up for the man on the Clapham omnibus?

Neuroskeptic said...

Well, no, but with a drug, you have the benefit of knowing that whatever you're experiencing is not "real", because it's caused by the drug. And it wears off after 3 hours.

Put it this way: on certain strains of cannabis I have experienced symptoms (hearing voices, paranoia, delusions of reference, and others) which, if they happened when I wasn't on a drug, would make me very worried that I was going psychotic. Assuming that I recognized them to be symptoms at all, without the grounding in reality provided by knowing I'd just smoked a joint.

I think I'm unusual in this respect as most of my friends have never experienced such symptoms but not unique, I know others get the same effects. and these things only happened occasionally, not every time. But they were happening often enough that I quit.

Socrates said...

A gentleman clinician of my cyber-acquaintance decided to get some first hand experience of what his boss said was responsible for a significant proportion of their acute admissions.

After waiting in vain for about half an hour for the effects of the ah, hem... dooberry to kick-in, he disappointedly resumed his (non clinical) day-to-day business - only for sometime later to be taken by an anxiety attack which lead to an acute admission of his own - for a suspected heart attack.

It was not until he was about to be discharged and had the adhesive pad painfully ripped from his manfully hairy chest did he remember that he had taken a huge dose of the real McCoy.

Silly Billy.

I have experienced symptoms (hearing voices, paranoia, delusions of reference, and others)

*snark* That's called being Stoned.

Neuroskeptic said...

"*snark* That's called being Stoned."

I know, but that's my point. Being stoned (sometimes) involves symptoms that, if they occurred in someone who wasn't stoned, would be considered psychotic.

Also I don't think it is just being stoned because I've been stoned without having those things. It did seem to depend upon the strain, although that might be a complete coincidence.

Socrates said...

Possibly not.

There's the well known THC but there's also a whole range of other psychoactive cannabinoids -

CBD (Cannabidiol)
CBN (Cannabinol)
THCV (Tetrahydrocannabivarin)
CBC (Cannabichromene)
CBL (Cannabicyclol)

I believe there are even more varieties created during the liver's attempt clean up the Stoner's mess.

Michael said...

RE "Where are all the extra psychotics argument"

It seems to me that the logic of this argument trumps the others. If there is a causal link, and there's more smoking, then there would have to be a rise in cases.

I can't think of any possible explanation of these data that maintains a causal link. (I'd be really interested to hear one.)

On the other hand, there seems to be possible explanations of all the correlations, on the supposition that there is no causal link. Eg. Being likely to develop psychosis makes you more likely to smoke cannabis. (In fact, there seems to be independent evidence for this too.)

Neuroskeptic said...

The obvious response would be that cannabis is causing extra psychosis, but something else is reducing the rates of psychosis which cancels it out.

Neuroskeptic said...

Although whatever that "something else" was, it would have to be really powerful, and we don't know what it is.

veri said...

You must be a shaman or possibly a p....... I sense a powerful chakra.. think of yourself like a radio tuning into different frequencies.

But it's a good thing you stopped. One could become a vessel for something else if they don't learn how to control it.

Anonymous said...

this is cool info