
“Mr. A” was a 43-year-old man...His most pressing medical complaint was worrisome fatigue. He was not depressed...had no formal psychiatric history, no family psychiatric history, and he was a successful businessman.
He was referred to the psychiatry department by his primary-care physician (PCP) because of a 2-year-long complaint of pruritus [itching] accompanied by the belief of being infested with parasites. Numerous visits to the infectious disease clinic and an extensive medical work-up...had not uncovered any medical disorder, to the patient’s great frustration.
Although no parasites were ever trapped, Mr. A caused skin damage by probing for them and by applying topical solutions such as hydrogen peroxide to “bring them to the surface.” After reading about Morgellons disease on the Internet, he “recalled” extruding particles from his skin, including “dirt” and “fuzz.”
During the initial consultation visit with the psychiatrist, Mr. A was apprehensive but cautiously optimistic that a medication could help. The psychiatrist had been forewarned by the PCP that the patient had discovered a website describing Morgellons and “latched onto” this diagnosis.
However, it was notable that the patient allowed the possibility (“30%”) that he was suffering from delusions (and not Morgellons), mostly because he trusted his PCP, “who has taken very good care of me for many years.”
The patient agreed to a risperidone [an antipsychotic] trial of up to 2 mg per day. [i.e. a lowish dose]. Within weeks, his preoccupation with being infested lessened significantly... Although not 100% convinced that he might not have Morgellons disease, he is no longer pruritic and is no longer damaging his skin or trying to trap insects. He remains greatly improved 1 year later.
"Morgellons" is, according to people who say they suffer from it, a mysterious disease characterised by the feeling of parasites or insects moving underneath the skin, accompanied by skin lesions out of which emerge strange, brightly-coloured fibres or threads. Other symptoms include fatigue, aches and pains, and difficulty concentrating.
According to almost all doctors, there are no parasites, the lesions are caused by the patient's own scratching or attempts to dig out the non-existent critters, and the fibres come from clothes, carpets, or other textiles which the patient has somehow inserted into their own skin. It may seem unbelievable that someone could do this "unconsciously", but stranger things have happened.
As the authors of this paper, Freudenreich et al, say, Morgellons is a disease of the internet age. It was "discovered" in 2002 by a Mary Leitao, with Patient Zero being her own 2 year old son. Since then its fame, and the reported number of cases, has grown steadily - especially in California.

This then is the raw material in most cases; what the concept of "Morgellons" adds is a theory, a social context and a set of expectations that helps make sense of the otherwise baffling symptoms. And as we know expectations, whether positive or negative, tend to be become experiences. The diagnosis doesn't create the symptoms out of nowhere but rather takes them and reshapes them into a coherent pattern.
As Freudenreich et al note, doctors may be tempted to argue with the patient - you don't have Morgellons, there's no such thing, it's absurd - but the whole point is that mainstream medicine couldn't explain the symptoms, which is why the patient turned to less orthodox ideas.
Remember the extensive tests that came up negative "to the patient’s great frustration." And remember that "delusional parasitosis" is not an explanation, just a description, of the symptoms. To diagnose someone with that is saying "We've no idea why but you've imagined this". True, maybe, but not very palatable.
Rather, they say, doctors should just suggest that maybe there's something else going on, and should prescribe a treatment on that basis. Not rejecting the patient's beliefs but saying, maybe you're right, but in my experience this treatment makes people with your condition feel better, and that's why you're here, right?
Whether the pills worked purely as a placebo or whether there was a direct pharmacological effect, we'll never know. Probably it was a bit of both. It's not clear that it's important, really. The patient improved, and it's unlikely that it would have worked as well if they'd been given in a negative atmosphere of coercion or rejection - if indeed he'd agreed to take them at all.
Morgellons is a classic case of a disease that consists of an underlying experience filtered through the lens of a socially-transmitted interpretation. But every disease is that, to a degree. Even the most rigorously "medical" conditions like cancer also come with a set of expectations and a social meaning; psychiatric disorders certainly do.
I guess Morgellons is too new to be a textbook case yet - but it should be. Everyone with an interest in the mind, everyone who treats diseases, and everyone who's ever been ill - everyone really - ought to be familiar with it because while it's an extreme case, it's not unique. "All life is here" in those tangled little fibres.

24 comments:
Given that antipsychotics have been demonstrated to cause (as opposed to correlate with) heart disease and metabolic derangements, it would make sense to do an RCT with TAU vs placebo first. I think the process you are describing is largely that of placebo, is it not?
I would be disinclined to use such a high harm-inducing medication as a first line treatment without a whole lot of evidence to support doing so.
What about CBT? Is there any evidence to support it as being efficacious?
This is a variant of conversion disorder. Instead of putting him on antipsychotics, someone should have taken the time to figure out what was REALLY itching him. You know, in a psychological sense. Jeez, this is the kind of therapeutic nihilism ushered in by mindless (aka biological) psychiatry.
No offense, but you've really got to get your head out of those Freudian books. I'll take a little biological reductionism over Freudian misdiagnosis any day. That said, I fully support evidence-based therapy techniques as a replacement or supplement to drugs.
This is a variant of conversion disorder....
Jeez, this is the kind of therapeutic nihilism ushered in by mindless (aka biological) psychiatry.
Yeah, right. Coz those non-biological, subjective, relativistic, mind based, culture soaked psychiatric explanations and therapies have worked out so well.
NOT.
For example, hot off the press, the failure of the major PACE trial on behavioural therapies for CFS (ME) - regarded by some in psychiatry as the archetypal example of conversion disorder - to deliver any genuinely substantial therapeutic result.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/7/6/
Not to mention the comparable therapeutic failure of the sister FINE trial.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20418251
Anybody who is familiar with this field will understand what a colossal failure this is, given the previous, sustained and rather grandiose claims made by the main proponents of this therapeutic approach in this field.
At the very least, you psycho-social fans got some serious re-thinking to do about the current version of your failed therapeutic model, and maybe your underlying 'explanatory' model as well.
And it might be a lot worse than that.
Just saying.
Is "conversion disorder" really more of an explanation than "delusional parasitosis"?
DP: "We don't know why but you've imagined it"
CD: "You've got issues, so you imagined this" "What issues?" "I don't know." "Why did I imagine this, specifically?" "No idea".
Well we're not plants. It's not like he contracted a real virus, apart fromm HIV. Wouldn't hurt to investigate inflammation/immune reactions tied to mental states. HIV positive patients go through extensive counseling, no small matter. Collaborating with a shrink is a given in this case.
Hey folks: Who said anything about psychoanalysis? Conversion disorder just means that there is a psychological dimension to the symptom production. You don't have to be "Freudian" to understand that. As for the rest of the shots at psychological therapies-- Jeez, your biological psychiatry models have REALLY made a difference, haven't they? Chemical imbalances, magnetics on the brain, blah, blah, blah. It's all bullshit. The only people biological psychiatrists have helped are the shareholders of pharma companies. The NIMH outcomes studies for depression (STAR-D) and schizophrenia (CATIE) have made that perfectly clear. Go ahead, mate, pop a few more pills.
Anon, I'm not a advocate of 'biological psychiatry', but saying that it doesn't work doesn't automatically mean that psychological therapies DO work.
Paul, I agree with you. I just think that psychiatrists need to evaluate for any psychological factors that might be operative in strange cases such as this one. And that doesn't mean that finding such a factor to be relevant will necessarily guarantee treatment success with a psychological intervention. And it certainly doesn't mean that doing so makes one a Freudian!
Neuroskeptic, please could you comment further on what you mean by social meaning in the context of cancer.
But every disease is that, to a degree. Even the most rigorously "medical" conditions like cancer also come with a set of expectations and a social meaning; psychiatric disorders certainly do.
The reason I ask is because the search for meaning is usually ignored by psychiatry in the case of people who experience psychosis. That is to say they regard the psychotic content as meaningless as far as treatment is concerned but to the patient "meaning" could be very important. Thats my motivation for asking for clarification of your meaning of social meaning in cancer.
Thanking you in advance.
Anon 00:27 - What I mean is that "cancer" is not just a set of rapidly dividing cells but also a diagnosis which people know about and that comes with a bundle of expectations, fears, beliefs, and so on.
This could be called the "meaning" of cancer although that's perhaps not an ideal term because it's rather different from the "meaning" of delusional content.
So for example I think most people expect cancer patients to be seriously ill, go bald, and die sooner or later, as soon as they hear the word "cancer".
Now this is unfortunately true somtimes but many cancers e.g. testicular cancer have a pretty good prognosis nowadays & can be completely cured a lot of the time. However they are still "cancer" so the meaning is very negative & this may cause negative expectations which could affect behaviour.
some people would say that negative expectations actually reduce cancer survival but I don't know if I believe that. but it will certainly affect how you feel & how other people behave to you.
"Morgellons" is just the same except in this case the expectations will also affect the symptoms (because they are psychological).
Delusional parasitosis is quite common. As far as I can see Morgellons is just the name that people with delusional parasitosis have got together and given their experiences.
In the same way, the internet is filled with people talking about 12ft lizards and miniature black helicopters. Just because the internet has allowed people with delusions to find other people with delusions to get support from doesn't mean they're any more 'true' or less delusional than they were before.
Antipsychotics are a standard treatment for delusional disorders so it isn't particularly surprising they would work for Morgellons just as they work for other delusional parasitosis. The problem of getting people to engage with treatment when they don't really believe that their experiences are delusional is a pretty core difficulty in psychiatry - the suggestion to people that antipsychotics are worth trying because they help some people with this disorder without telling them they're 'mad' and need psychoactive meds would be a typical approach - if they had other well circumscribed delusions that weren't particularly distressing or interfering with their functioning then you might not treat them at all.
pj: Antipsychotics work for delusional disorders? That has not been my experience. Delusional disorder is the most intractable psychotic disorder known to man and woman kind.In the case at hand, the patient still believes (partly) his delusional belief. He is not scratching himself, which is a good thing. And maybe that has to do with his medication and maybe not. It could be due to his belief in his PCP who he trusts. We will never know. But if antipsychotics work in these conditions, can we arrange for a drop shipment of these medications to the Middle East and the next Tea Party convention in America?
I've seen very good responses to antipsychotics in delusional parasitosis (never seen Morgellons mind you) which would be consistent with the literature.
Anon, lol. it wouldn't be potent enough. I do wonder though if computers can give us bugs, even if it is just mental. Interesting to find out what kind of cyber habits they were up to. Because I'm sure there's a host of cyber related disorders emerging at the moment.
pj: Consistent with the literature????? WTF?
Conclusions In the absence of controlled trials there is limited evidence that antipsychotics are effective in primary delusional parasitosis. Rigorous studies are needed to evaluate their effectiveness and to compare typical and atypical antipsychotics directly.
No, not WTF. The results of that study say:
"No randomised trials were found and hence we collected the best evidence from 16 other trials and case reports, separating primary from other forms of delusional parasitosis. Studies using typical antipsychotics showed partial or full remission in between 60 and 100% of patients. Analysis of selected patients with primary delusional parasitosis showed that typical and atypical antipsychotics were effective in the majority, but that remission rates did not differ significantly between typical and atypical antipsychotics."
So there's no gold standard RCT evidence that they work, but the balance of evidence that exists suggests that they do work, which is contrary to what you claimed.
pj: With all due respect, spin it any way you want. The evidence is just not that convincing.
Morgellons disease is a skin disorder that has not yet gained widespread acceptance that it actually exists. It is similar to scabies, which is a contagious skin disease in which parasites burrow under the skin and lay eggs. These parasites belong to the arachnid family. Some symptoms vary from one patient to another. Others, such as skin lesions and a “crawling sensation” in the skin are consistent. Areas of the body where the disease seems to be most severe are on the hands, behind the knees and arms, on the chest and back. Other common physical symptoms are rashes and pain that is similar to fibromyalgia.
Many patients have reported trouble concentrating and constantly experience fatigue. When affected areas are viewed under a microscope, many Morgellons patients have clusters of dark fibers beneath the unbroken skin. These fibers are not visible with the naked eye. These fibers frequently work their way out of the skin via the sores and lesions that accompany the disease. Unlike scabies, there are no parasites present when patients are tested. However, a recent study has found a microscopic parasite in some patients. This parasite is known to feed on algae, bacteria and decaying organic materials. They thrive in wet or damp surroundings.
The results are inconclusive as a cause for Morgellons disease. The Centers for Disease Control refers to it as an unexplained dermopathy. Many dermatologists and psychiatrists consider this a psychological disorder, rather than a physical disease. Medical doctors generally treat the condition by prescribing antibiotics, antifungals or herbal supplements. These methods are considered treatments rather than cures, as the symptoms return when discontinued. Colloidal silver has been marketed as an alternative medicine for this condition as well as many others, from fibromyalgia to E. coli. From a medical standpoint, there is no proven effectiveness for this treatment.
Regardless of official reports, many Morgellons sufferers have found relief when it is used. They state that the lesions begin to heal after a week, with the sores dissipating within two weeks. The bouts of stinging and biting sensations that plague sufferers are reduced or disappear altogether. The most severe symptoms are debilitating and in many sufferers, their quality of life is reduced. For more information on scientifically engineers, cluster water and the many advantages of using colloidal silver for a healthier life, visit the web site at www.nutrasilver.com.
I'm going to let that spam stand, as it's quite informative in a weird way, but anyone tempted to try colloidal silver should see this...
This is terrible. Loosely associating HIV with morgellons, especially given the CDC's focus around SF. Where are the so called people who were part of this study? You'd think they'd be around chatting somewhere, somewhere on the internet. But no, this is not the case. The whole thing stinks of 3 letter organizations and psycho-social perverts. Bioweapons 101 - scam to sell stupify and the it's cousins.
My family member believed he had morgellons for two years. Had tons of "specimens" and spent hours daily scratching himself,cleaning and doing internet searches on the military and their environmental "research" which he felt infested him. His body was all scars and open sores. He agreed to go on Respiradol and after taking 1mg daily soon stopped all the scratching and all the morgellon related activity. He had always been a little nutty before and continued to be a little odd but the morgellons was gone.
He now thinks he was spontaneously cured.
Interesting. Thanks.
This is a recent scientific study on Morgellons, demonstrating that it is not delusional. Fibres are shown to be produced by human cells. http://www.omicsonline.org/2155-9554/2155-9554-3-140.php?aid=5477
Further studies into the composition and origin of the filaments and other skin debris from Morgellons patients are apparently on their way.
Post a Comment