A new paper just out from Tomasi and Volkow (of cell-phones-affect-brain fame) offers, on the face of it, extremely strong evidence for a gender difference in the brain, not in structure but in function: Gender Differences in Brain Functional Connectivity Density.
Here's the headline pic:
As you can see the results were highly consistent around the world. In both men and women, the main "connectivity hub" was an area called the ventral precuneus. This is interesting in itself although not a new finding as the precuneus has long been known to be involved in resting-state networks. However, the degree of connectivity was higher in women than in men 14% higher, in fact.
The method they used, which they've dubbed "Local Functional Connectivity Density Mapping", is apparantly a fast way of calculating the degree to which each part of the brain is functionally related to each other part.
You could do this by taking every single voxel and correlating it with every other voxel, for every single person, but this would take forever unless you had a supercomputer. LFCDM is, they say, a short-cut. I'm not really qualified to judge whether it's a valid one, but it looks solid.
Also, men's brains were on average bigger, but interestingly they show that women had, relative to brain size, more grey matter than men. Here's the data (I'm not sure about the color scheme...)
Or you could say, that that's sexist rubbish, and all this means is that men and women on average are thinking about different things when they lie in MRI scanners. We already know that resting-state functional connectivity centred on the precuneus is suppressed whenever your attention is directed towards an external "task".
That's not a fault of this research, which is excellent as far as it goes and certainly raises lots of interesting questions about functional connectivity. But we don't know what it means quite yet.

10 comments:
The men weren't resting; they were thinking about sex. (Apologies!)
FYI: Broken link to the brain data!
"You...interpret the highly interconnected female brain as an explanation for why women are more holistic, better at multi-tasking, and more in touch with their emotions than men with their fragmented faculties..."
You've just written dozens of headlines citing this article for major news publications. No tough research required!
anonymous: Cheers, fixed.
JMG: This story doesn't seem to have made the headlines yet; I guess they didn't put out a sufficiently simplistic press-release...
I think comparison between a human society and brain can be useful here. In order to perform a complex task, you can construct a society with expert separate modules (hubs) and less interaction between them. As well, you can design a society with less modular characteristics and more connectivities.These two networks might work in same manner in most of the tasks, but you can presume existence of tasks in which one the networks outperform the other: "You...interpret the highly interconnected female brain as an explanation for why women are more holistic, better at multi-tasking, and more in touch with their emotions than men with their fragmented faculties..." Isn't it sensible?
Oh sure, it's quite possible, but we can't infer that from these data, because it might be something less interesting. Or something equally interesting but different.
Interesting finding - but like you said, it's not clear what to make of it. It is pretty neat though that they were able to replicate their own findings across different samples of women.
And to me, that makes it better than most of the papers I read in in this area (mostly in psychiatry) that detail a study where they scan some X number of people with some disorder and then claim they differ from controls on some brain region/gene/protein/or some other random biological buzzword of the day.
I have to say I'm pretty surprised that Nora Volkow wrote this, given her recent paper showing how fMRI EPI gradients affect cerebral glucose metabolism:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20156571
I honestly think that that kind of research calls into question a lot of the resting state work...
Isn't the difference in brain size between women and men in correlation with the difference in body mass? That, at least, is the explanation I heard for men having, on average, a bigger brain size.
Bradley: Interesting point, I hadn't seen that paper actually, thanks for the tipoff, definately an important issue...
Post a Comment